MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983953510 · doi:10.1115/pvp2007-26703

Elastic-Plastic Shakedown Assessment of Piping Using a Non-Cyclic Method

2007· article· en· W1983953510 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2: Computer Applications/Technology and Bolted Joints · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShakedownPipingStructural engineeringRatchetBendingBoiler (water heating)Materials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis for shakedown in nuclear Class 1 piping following NB-3600 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code contains several simplifications and can be overly conservative in some cases and potentially non-conservative in some others. A detailed elastic-plastic analysis following NB-3228.4, on the other hand, is computationally expensive and time consuming because an elastic-plastic model needs to be cycled to stabilization. A non-cyclic method to assess elastic plastic shakedown (absence of ratcheting) has been proposed and is applied to the analysis of some simple straight piping scenarios. Interaction diagrams similar to the Bree diagram are derived for other loading situations, such as thermal bending in conjunction with primary bending. The effect of piping boundary conditions on the ratchet boundary is explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it