Endothelin A and B receptor antagonist bosentan reduces postischemic myocardial injury in the rat: critical timing of administration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of bosentan, a mixed endothelin receptor A and B subtype antagonist, on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and to explore the influence of the timing of bosentan administration on its cardioprotective effects. Adult rat hearts were perfused by the Langendorff technique with Krebs-Henseleit solution (KH) at a constant flow rate at 10 mL/min. Global myocardial ischemia was induced by stopping KH perfusion for 40 min, and this was followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Hearts were randomized to 1 of 3 experimental groups (n = 7 each): untreated control; treatment with bosentan 1 micromol/L 10 min prior to, during 40 min global ischemia, and for 15 min of reperfusion (BOS); or treatment with bosentan 1 micromol/L after 15 min of reperfusion (BOS-R). We observed that BOS-R, but not the BOS treatment regimen, significantly reduced the release of cardiac-specific creatine kinase and postischemic myocardial infarct size (P < 0.05 vs. control) without affecting myocardial contractility. Left ventricular developed pressure in the BOS group was significantly (P < 0.01) lower than that in the control group throughout reperfusion. It is concluded that pharmacologically delayed antagonism of endothelin-1 during reperfusion attenuates postischemic myocardial injury. Endothelin-1 antagonist application during early reperfusion may exacerbate postischemic myocardial dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".