MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1983968211 · doi:10.1080/14683857.2015.1015316

The value of freedom: a case study of Ukraine

2015· article· en· W1983968211 on OpenAlexaff
Антон Олейник

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Economic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Context (archaeology)Transformative learningContradictionMeaning (existential)Presidential systemValue (mathematics)Freedom of the pressPower (physics)Political scienceSociologyMathematicsLawEpistemologyPoliticsStatisticsGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The instrumental and terminal values of freedom are differentiated and considered in the context of its particular forms: freedom to, freedom from and freedom together. It is demonstrated that the contradiction between power and freedom does not hold for all these forms. Namely, freedom to has a very similar meaning to power to and freedom together – to transformative power. This approach sheds new light on the Ukrainian case. The case study involves using two types of analysis: statistical analysis, namely with the help of a multiple regression model, of the World Values Survey data-set (N = 1000 in Ukraine in 2006) and content analysis of the official programmes of 10 presidential candidates in 2010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Southeast European and Black Sea StudiesSame topicGlobal Economic and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207