MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984062290 · doi:10.1109/icpp.2003.1240598

A QoS MAC protocol for differentiated service in mobile ad hoc networks

2003· article· en· W1984062290 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceQuality of serviceWireless ad hoc networkThroughputMobile ad hoc networkBlocking (statistics)Ad hoc wireless distribution serviceCountdownOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolVehicular ad hoc networkWirelessRouting protocolTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose the prioritized binary countdown (PBC) scheme for effective quality of service (QoS) supports in mobile ad hoc networks. We evaluate the performance of PBC, IEEE 802.11,802.11e, and two extensions to 802.11e in terms of their differentiation capability, throughput, delay, discarding ratio, blocking rate, and collision rate. Our simulation results show that PBC has considerably higher throughput and smaller delay, dropping ratios, blocking rates, and collision rates as compared to CSMA/CA of IEEE 802.11. We also show that PBC have considerably stronger differentiation capability than IEEE 802.11e and its extensions in multihop ad hoc networking environments

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207