MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984081854 · doi:10.1017/s0963548311000101

Lower Bounds for the Cop Number when the Robber is Fast

2011· article· en· W1984081854 on OpenAlexaff
Abbas Mehrabian

Bibliographic record

VenueCombinatorics Probability Computing · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a variant of the Cops and Robbers game where the robber can move t edges at a time, and show that in this variant, the cop number of a d -regular graph with girth larger than 2 t +2 is Ω( d t ). By the known upper bounds on the order of cages, this implies that the cop number of a connected n -vertex graph can be as large as Ω( n 2/3 ) if t ≥ 2, and Ω( n 4/5 ) if t ≥ 4. This improves the Ω( $n^{\frac{t-3}{t-2}}$ ) lower bound of Frieze, Krivelevich and Loh (Variations on cops and robbers, J. Graph Theory , to appear) when 2 ≤ t ≤ 6. We also conjecture a general upper bound O ( n t / t +1 ) for the cop number in this variant, generalizing Meyniel's conjecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.015
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCombinatorics Probability ComputingSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207