MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984123453 · doi:10.5539/cis.v1n2p80

The Research on the Mode of Making Use of the Microcomputer Circularly

2008· article· en· W1984123453 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTechnology and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrocomputerComputer scienceMode (computer interface)GridMonopolyPoint (geometry)Resource (disambiguation)Computer hardwareTelecommunicationsOperating systemComputer networkEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eliminated speed of the microcomputer has become aggravated year by year, it brings huge of economic loss and causes very bad result of the environment pollution, much attention have already been paid to this problem internationally. For this, they put forward the mode of making use of the microcomputer circularly, point out that the monopoly of the operating system has a negative influence to the microcomputer, and analyze the real need of the enterprise for the microcomputer hardware. Meanwhile, they give some effective plans to resolve it. They offer the grid technique that will postpone the speed of the microcomputer’s elimination with the mode of making use of the microcomputer circularly, the technique of the balance of the network resource and so on.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it