MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984138080 · doi:10.1109/acc.2010.5531434

Uniting Safe-parking and reconfiguration-based approaches for fault-tolerant control of switched nonlinear systems

2010· article· en· W1984138080 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl reconfigurationBackupScheduleActuatorComputer scienceNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Fault (geology)Control engineeringFault toleranceKey (lock)Control (management)Control systemMode (computer interface)EngineeringDistributed computingEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work considers the problem of control of switched nonlinear systems that transit between their constituent modes subject to input constraints and actuator faults. A framework is developed to handle faults that preclude the possibility of continued nominal operation in the active mode. Two types of switching schedules are considered. For a fixed schedule, we design a fault-handling algorithm to safe-park the system using the depleted control action. For a flexible schedule, the consideration is to switch the system to a mode (if exists and available) where nominal operation is preserved under either the active or any backup control configuration in the presence of the fault. The key ideas of the proposed framework are illustrated via a switched chemical reactor example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207