MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984143464 · doi:10.1021/ie0205039

Fines Deposition Dynamics in Packed-Bed Bubble Reactors

2002· article· en· W1984143464 on OpenAlexaff
Ion Iliuta, Faı̈çal Larachi

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBubbleSuspension (topology)MechanicsPacked bedPorosityFiltration (mathematics)Two-phase flowPressure dropChemistryMaterials scienceFlow (mathematics)ChromatographyComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When liquid suspensions containing fine solids are treated in packed-bed bubble reactors, bed plugging develops and increases the resistance to two-phase flow. Accumulation of fines in the catalyst bed increases the reactor pressure gradient until eventually the unit must be shut down and the physical ly d eactivated catalyst replaced. Currently, physical models linking the two-phase flow to the space−time evolution of fines buildup are virtually nonexistent. An attempt has been made with this contribution to fill in this gap by developing a unidirectional dynamic multiphase flow model based on the volume-average equations of mass and momentum balance for the gas and suspension and the species balance for the fines. Coherent with experimental observations, the model hypothesizes that plugging develops through deep-bed filtration mechanisms. The model incorporates physical effects of porosity and effective specific surface area changes due to the fines capture by the collecting catalyst particles, inertial effects in the gas and suspension, and coupling effects between the filtration parameters and the interfacial momentum exchange force terms. For the rationalization of deep-bed filtration phenomena in packed-bed bubble reactors, parametric studies of the effects of liquid velocity and viscosity, gas density and velocity, fines concentration in the influent suspension, and fines diameter on the plugging dynamics are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207