Mineração versus Paleontologia: uso e ocupação da serra do Veadinho em Peirópolis - Uberaba, Estado de Minas Gerais (Brasil)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peirópolis is a quarter located in Uberaba County (Minas Gerais State) that has an extraordinary paleontological site of the Late Cretaceous period. This area has many vertebrate fossils, mainly dinosaurs. A great amount of these fossils were found in sandstones of the serra do Veadinho. However, a lower limestone level was economically mining by European's immigrants between 1890 and 1960. In this period, the explotation was accomplished through manual exploration's techniques contributing to the discovery of fossils. Although, in 1987, the mineral explotation was conducted through mechanical techniques, causing environmental impacts and fossil destruction. Therefore, a judicial dispute has started to the use and occupation of the area between the miner activity, local population and geoscientists. Nowadays, the area is for exclusive use of the paleontological research and, in the future, touristic activity. In this context, was analysed a historic review of the use and occupation of serra do Veadinho to examine the compatibility between miner activity and paleontological research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it