MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984147818 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2013.6831363

Degrees of freedom of MIMO cellular networks: Two-cell three-user-per-cell case

2013· article· en· W1984147818 on OpenAlexaff
Gokul Sridharan, Wei Yu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOBeamformingBottleneckBase stationDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Cellular networkTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceInterference (communication)Upper and lower boundsSet (abstract data type)MathematicsMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we investigate the spatially-normalized degrees of freedom (sDoF) of 2-cell, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) cellular networks with three users per cell having M antennas at each user and N antennas at each base-station. We characterize the optimal sDoF/user for all values of M and N and show that the optimal sDoF is a piecewise linear function, with either M or N being the bottleneck. We assume all channels to be generic, and establish achievability through linear transmit beamforming strategies. We introduce the notion of packing ratio that describes the interference footprint or shadow cast by a set of transmit beamformers. Through this notion, we reinterpret the alternating behavior of the optimal sDoF and attribute it to the availability of sets of transmit beamformers with certain packing ratios. We also derive a new DoF outer bound when 5 over 9 ≤ M over N ≤ 3 over 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207