MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984174068 · doi:10.1159/000075331

Altered Habituation in the Auditory Cortex in a Subgroup of Depressed Patients by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2004· article· en· W1984174068 on OpenAlexaff
Nikolaus Michael, Jens Ostermann, Peter Sörös, Wolfram Schwindt, Bettina Pfleiderer

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropsychobiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsBaycrest Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabituationFunctional magnetic resonance imagingAuditory cortexStimulationPsychologyNeuroscienceAudiologyMagnetic resonance imagingFunctional imagingMajor depressive disorderCortex (anatomy)Analysis of varianceMedicineCognitionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to measure and quantify habituation effects to auditory stimulation within the auditory cortex of 11 depressed patients with major depressive disorder compared to 11 healthy subjects. Habituation was visualized by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) employing a block design (repeated stimulation with sine tones). A subgroup of patients (n = 5) presented the following abnormal habituation fMRI pattern: significantly lower activation after the first stimulation block (p = 0.05), missing characteristic signal decay to repeated acoustic stimulation and a marked undershoot after each stimulation block. This abnormal pattern may indicate functional deficits in auditory processing occurring with depression, but our results need be confirmed in a larger, more homogeneous patient group. This paradigm may be a useful tool for assessing cortical dysfunction in mood disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropsychobiologySame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207