MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984183617 · doi:10.1353/mdr.0.0101

Edward Albee (review)

2009· article· en· W1984183617 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas P. Adler

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourScholarshipExistentialismHumanismLiteratureArtHistoryArt historyPhilosophyTheologyLawEpistemologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Edward Albee Thomas P. Adler Toby Zinman . Edward Albee. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008. Pp. 163, illustrated. $18.95 (Pb). Although not intended as such, Toby Zinman's engaging book might almost be seen as a companion to the recently published three-volume Collected Plays of Edward Albee, whose appearance she mentions in her introduction. Arranged chronologically, the book's brief essays (anywhere from four to fourteen pages long) introduce theatregoers and readers to each of Albee's original, though not his four adapted, works from The Zoo Story (1958) through Occupant (2008). As befits a series of books on modern dramatists that Michigan intends to be "concise" and "accessible," Zinman's approach is informal and even chatty. Surprising, however, for a university press book is the virtual absence of any reference to or acknowledgement of the previous academic scholarship about Albee's plays. [End Page 254] Zinman's method is appropriately suggestive rather than prescriptive, eschewing what she calls "hermetically sealed interpretations" and offering instead strategies or possibilities to help audiences generate "their own understandings and appreciations" (2). So Zoo Story, along with being seen as "a sociopolitical critique" indicting a society that values "materialism instead of humanism" (17), is also given several allegorical (Christian, existential, homosexual, psychological) readings. Or Seascape (1975) (not, as Zinman says, the first of Albee's works to win the Pulitzer, an honour earlier accorded A Delicate Balance [1966]) is discussed from the perspective of "Literary Darwinism" (79) as well as being subjected to various mythic, political, and gender approaches. One of Zinman's richest chapters considers a play thus far little analysed, The Goat or, Who is Sylvia? (2002), which she regards as Albee's most explicit examination of "the limits of tolerance" (141) and of the enormous difficulty of understanding "the vagaries of human passion (149). She concludes that, for the playwright, "human sexuality is more complex, far wider, deeper, and less governable than we generally think" (149). Occasionally, an observation will seem strained, as when Zinman proposes that The Sandbox (1959) be viewed as Albee's "comment on the movies [as] the Angel of Death to the theater" (34). Zinman's play-by-play format, however, never allows her to see Albee whole and compels readers to do much of the synthesizing for themselves, without an index to assist in that. Zinman does provide some connections along the way, by mentioning writers who influenced Albee (in particular Beckett, but also Ibsen and Kafka, Pinter and O'Neill, though Pirandello is unaccountably missing); by making fresh and unexpected allusions (to Einstein and Bohr and Coetzee or to Kiss Me, Kate / The Taming of the Shrew, Two Gentlemen of Verona, and the Shakespearean green world); and by addressing both Albee's distinctive use of language (Delicate Balance, All Over [1971] and Counting the Ways [1977]) and his indebtedness to musical forms (Box and Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse Tung [1968], Listening [1976], and Fragments [1991]). She notices, as well, repeated narrative devices: the arrival of intruders who put other characters to a test (several plays from Zoo Story on) or the centrality of a real or illusory child (from The American Dream [1960] and Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? [1962] to The Play about the Baby [1998]). Finally, she points to recurrent thematic motifs that mark many of Albee's most significant works: the necessity of rejecting a too-comfortable status quo; the need to embrace "the challenge of change" (65) and the possibility for growth it brings with it; the "power of memory to reinvent reality" (120); the certainty of "loss" that accompanies "time's pressures and its passage" (8); and "the inevitably of mortality" (33) and our fear in the face of it. In citing acts of betrayal as a dominant failure on the part of Albee's characters, Zinman might well have underscored more sharply rejections [End Page 255] of the other predicated on loathing or prejudice of a sexual nature, especially in the case of the central character in Three Tall Women (1991) who ostracizes her son for his homosexuality. Of course, what frequently appears as betrayal in Albee's works from Zoo Story...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchFrench-language works237,207