MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984186823 · doi:10.5430/wje.v2n1p82

New Competences for the Pre-shool Teacher: A Successful Response to the Challenges of the 21st Century

2012· article· en· W1984186823 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maja Ljubetić

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfessional developmentPedagogyCurriculumPsychologyQuality (philosophy)Early childhoodCompetence (human resources)Early childhood educationIdentity (music)Medical educationMedicineDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Only those individuals who are prepared for the professional challenges of the 21st century can aptly respond to them. The quality of the educational-upbringing system, in particular the preliminary one, which is early childhood and pre-school education, is the priority for every society which has a clear development strategy and which has a systematic educational policy. Particular attention, therefore, should be devoted to the initial training and continuing professional development of the educator. This is necessary in order for them to acquire the necessary pedagogical competences needed for working with children of an early and pre-school age. Only a competent educator can achieve favourable conditions which enable the development of the child's competences. Various roles demand various competences which the educator must possess such as: competences linked to understanding and advancing the child; learning; monitoring, evaluation, improving processes; school, family, local community; curriculum and the competences necessary for improving the educator’s own personal traits and professional activity. By improving these competences, the educator systematically builds his/her professional identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyFrench-language works237,207