Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the object trajectory tracking control for flexible-link cooperating manipulators. In particular, we develop a stable inversion control law which is commonly known as the inverse dynamics control or the computed torque method for rigid manipulators. Difficulties in applying this method to the control of flexible link manipulators are due to the fact that the inverse dynamics system is generally unstable because of the inherently unstable zero dynamics. As such, bounded actuator torques cannot be guaranteed. For multiple manipulators handling a common object, there are more actuators than the degrees of freedom of the system. Through decomposing the manipulator end-effector wrenches into resultant and internal force components, control laws are derived such that the internal forces are used to stabilize the system zero dynamics. Consequently, nonlinear inversion control can be applied for the object trajectory tracking control. Numerical simulations are performed to illustrate the performance of the control strategy developed in the paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it