MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984205373 · doi:10.2118/146738-ms

Experimental Analysis of Heavy Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage by Alternate Injection of Steam and CO2 in Deep Naturally Fractured Reservoir

2012· article· en· W1984205373 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSolubilityEnhanced oil recoveryHydrocarbonDissolutionSteam injectionSolventLight crude oilMatrix (chemical analysis)Isothermal processMiscibilityChemistrySteam-assisted gravity drainageEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceThermodynamicsGeologyChromatographyOrganic chemistryPolymerComposite materialOil sands

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam injection in heavy-oil containing naturally fractured reservoir aims at heating matrix to reduce the viscosity and enhance gravity drainage. This technique, however, is not feasible in deep reservoirs. Hydrocarbon solvent injection is also impractical due to low gravity of oil, heterogeneity, and retrieval of solvent diffused into matrix. A hybrid application of these two techniques was tested for deep reservoir conditions earlier (Steam Over Solvent Injection in Fractured Reservoirs Method -SOS-FR) and proved success if applied suitably. The cost of hydrocarbon solvent and greenhouse gas concerns, however, entail investigations on other techniques and materials. The use of CO2 in this type of process as solvent was considered and tested in this paper. Several issues are highly critical in this process. Like other hydrocarbon solvents used under non-isothermal conditions, the recovery process is highly sensitive to pressure and temperature as they determine the miscibility level. Also important is the capability of CO2 to extract matrix oil. Our earlier studies with light oil showed that heavier ends can be extracted if enough time is allowed for CO2 to interact with matrix oil. The same needs to be investigated for heavy-oils. Another dilemma was inverse proportionality of CO2 solubility with temperature. Steam (or heating) is inevitable to condition oil and decrease its viscosity before CO2 injection but temperature should be critically adjusted not to sacrifice CO2 solubility of oil. To clarify all these points and determine optimal application conditions (duration of each cycles and CO2 soaking time), we conducted a series of experiments by soaking core samples saturated with heavy oil into steam first followed by CO2. In the third cycle, steam (or hot water) was injected again to produce upgraded oil in the matrix. The experiments were performed under static conditions (soaking sandpacks and sandstone samples into steam or CO2 chambers) at different temperatures and pressures to determine optimal application conditions for mutual goals; heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage in the matrix. Finally, the results were compared to those of experiments with hydrocarbon solvents from technical point of view including storage benefits of CO2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it