MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Curriculum Integration: Teaching In, Through, and About Dance in Primary and Secondary Education

2001· article· en· W1984227796 on OpenAlexaff
Susan R. Koff, Mary Jane Warner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dance Education · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumDanceIntegrated curriculumDance educationThe artsValue (mathematics)PedagogySociologyMathematics educationPsychologyEngineering ethicsEngineeringComputer scienceVisual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Curriculum integration is a controversial topic with some educators showing strong support for integration and others rejecting the concept because of its potential to threaten the teaching of discipline-based arts courses. The authors examine some of the literature on integration, especially as it relates to dance, and conclude that integration has considerable value in the school system. The advantages and disadvantages of integration are addressed, and examples of successful integration projects are included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dance EducationSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207