MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984241264 · doi:10.1145/1577504.1577505

Location aware computing for academic environments

2007· article· en· W1984241264 on OpenAlexaff
Michael McGuire, Eugene Hyun, Mihai Sima

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTerminal (telecommunication)Software deploymentWirelessWireless networkMobile computingContext (archaeology)Ubiquitous computingWireless site surveyPoint (geometry)Field (mathematics)Location-based serviceComputer networkDistributed computingWi-Fi arrayTelecommunicationsGeographyHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Location aware computing is a new field of research that advocates the development applications for mobile computing platforms that allow users to make use of the mobile data access that wireless communications provide and take advantage of the location context of data. However, the deployment of location aware computing has been limited by the lack of accurate, low cost wireless terminal location methods. This paper introduces a non-parametric method for locating wireless terminals where the location estimates are weighted averages of the positions of survey points within the network environment. The weights are determined by the amount of similarity between the received signal strengths measurements made by the wireless terminal and the measurements made at the survey point locations. This paper demonstrates how to tune this algorithm based on the survey data without requiring an excessive number of survey points to be collected in the network area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207