MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984249228 · doi:10.1145/1314690.1314695

On specification of Read/Write shared variables

2007· article· en· W1984249228 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the ACM · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVariable (mathematics)Inter-process communicationConsistency (knowledge bases)AbstractionValue (mathematics)Programming languageDistributed computingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A shared variable is an abstraction of persistent interprocess communication. Processors execute operations, often concurrently, on shared variables to exchange information among themselves. The behavior of operation executions is required to be “consistent” for effective interprocess communication. Consequently, a consistency specification of a shared variable describes some guarantees on the behavior of the operation executions. A Read/Write shared variable has two operations: a Write stores a specified value in the variable and a Read returns a value from the variable. For Read/Write variables, a consistency specification describes what values Reads may return. Using an intuitive notion of illegality of Reads, we propose a framework that facilitates specifying a large variety of Read/Write variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it