Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les remarques que j'ai à proposer sur le thème de la famille en regard du phénomène d'urbanisation se basent sur trois séries d'entrevues, recherches entreprises au Département de sociologie et d'anthropologie de Laval, l'une par Jocelyne Valois et les deux autres par moi-même. La première de ces recherches remonte à l'hiver de 1962-1963; il s'agit d'une étude exploratoire en vue d'établir un modèle général de la famille ouvrière urbaine québécoise. À cet effet, 72 entrevues ont été recueillies auprès de femmes d'ouvriers de quatre entreprises montréalaises. La seconde recherche, celle de Jocelyne Valois, s'est effectuée dans le quartier Saint-Sauveur de Québec; 52 familles ont été visitées en 1956-1966. Quant à la dernière recherche, actuellement en cours, il s'agit de 28 familles d'ouvriers des raffineries de pétrole de Montréal que j'ai interviewées au cours de l'automne de 1966.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".