MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984256139 · doi:10.1089/rej.2008.0750

Aging and Neutrophils: There Is Still Much To Do

2008· review· en· W1984256139 on OpenAlex
Carl Fortin, Patrick P. McDonald, Olivier Lesur, Tamàs Fülöp

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRejuvenation Research · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunologyReactive oxygen speciesImmune systemChemotaxisMajor histocompatibility complexPhagocytosisReceptorAntigen presentationBiologyDiseaseStimulationAntigenCell biologyNeuroscienceMedicineT cellGeneticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human neutrophils are activated by a wide array of compounds through their receptors. This elicits their classical functions, such as chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Upon stimulation, neutrophils also produce lipid and immune mediators and can present antigen through the major histocompatibility complex I (MHC-I). The age-related impairment of the classical functions of neutrophils is well described, but experimental evidence showing alterations in the production of mediators and antigen presentation with aging are lacking. This review highlights the role of neutrophils in age-related pathologies such as Alzheimer's disease, atherosclerosis, cancer, and autoimmune diseases. Furthermore, we discuss how aging potentially affects the production and release of mediators by human neutrophils in ways that may contribute to the development of these pathologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it