Friends of Liberty: Thomas Jefferson, Tadeusz Kosciuszko, and Agrippa Hull; A Tale of Three Patriots, Two Revolutions, and a Tragic Betrayal of Freedom in the New Nation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gary B. Nash and Graham Russell Gao Hodges have used three intertwined biographies to craft a story of the American Revolution and its confrontation with slavery. Agrippa Hull was a free African American born in Massachusetts; Tadeusz Kosciuszko, the second son of a Polish petty noble family; and Thomas Jefferson—well, he needs no introduction. All three participated in the Revolution: Kosciuszko as a brilliant military engineer; Hull as his orderly; and Jefferson as the author of the Declaration of Independence and governor of Virginia. After the war Hull returned to Stockbridge, Massachusetts, where he worked for a local elite family and patiently built a stable and successful life. Kosciuszko returned to Europe, where he led the failed Polish independence movement of 1794. An international hero, but gravely wounded, Kosciuszko was imprisoned in Russia until a new czar, Paul I, released him in 1796. He arrived in Philadelphia in 1797, where he lived for a year, became close friends with Jefferson, and claimed his revolutionary back pay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".