Crise ou modernisation. La société rurale maskoutaine durant le premier tiers du XIXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crise ou modernisation? L’évolution de la société rurale bas-canadienne durant le premier tiers du XIX e siècle suscite beaucoup de controverses. Les objectifs du présent article sont de vérifier, à l’échelle micro-régionale, la croissance ou le recul de l’économie rurale et de caractériser les structures économiques et sociales au cours de cette période. L’évolution des campagnes maskoutaines s’insère dans une dynamique de transition au capitalisme. La pénétration croissante du marché entraîne l’amélioration globale des niveaux de vie et des niveaux de fortune. Elle favorise aussi la différenciation sociale de la paysannerie. L’émergence du prolétariat rural et de l’artisanat résultent à la fois de la croissance économique et de la poussée démographique. Les transformations de la société rurale ne sont toutefois ni rapides ni radicales. La société rurale est au rendez-vous de la croissance économique durant le premier tiers du XIX e siècle. Mais ce type de développement qui renforce les inégalités au sein de la société rurale ne modifie pas substantiellement les anciennes structures économiques et sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".