MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984317394 · doi:10.7202/200976ar

Les stratégies énonciatives dans Le Vierge incendié

2006· article· fr· W1984317394 on OpenAlexaffvenue
André Marquis

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPresuppositionPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Ce texte propose une lecture pragmatique du Vierge incendié de Paul-Marie Lapointe en examinant, entre autres, les notions d'espace-temps, de modalisation et de presupposition. Il tente de mettre à jour les principales stratégies énonciatives qui sous-tendent le recueil. On constate ainsi que le narrateur, dont la subjectivité transparaît dans le choix des termes axio-logiques, recourt à la structure infinitive pour produire ses énoncés les plus percutants. Les déclarations péremptoires assurent, en effet, puissance et fermeté à ce discours poétique qui rompt avec V'horizon d'attente* de l'époque. L'imbrication surprenante des tropes s'avère, quant à elle, le lieu premier de l'interrogation pour le lecteur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207