Temperature increases associated with polymerization of irradiated PAG dosimeters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyacrylamide gel (PAG) dosimeters show considerable promise as three-dimensional dosimeters for the verification of complex dose distributions associated with conformal therapy. However, the potential of PAG dosimeters has not yet been borne out in clinical practice and it is apparent that basic investigations of these dosimeters are still required. The polymerization reactions in PAG dosimeters are exothermic and the heat given off by the reactions may influence polymerization reaction kinetics. We report the results of in situ measurements of local temperature increases in irradiated PAG resulting from heat generated by the radiation-induced exothermic polymerization reactions. Temperature changes proportional to the absorbed dose were observed in the irradiated gels, reaching a maximum of 12 degrees C under high-dose conditions, depending on the thermal boundary conditions. This has practical implications, for example, using small vials of PAG to calibrate large phantoms may not be appropriate since temperature differences during irradiation between the calibration vials and phantom may alter the morphology and quantity of the polymer formed, even when irradiated to the same dose. The inhibition of radiation-induced polymerization associated with low-level oxygen contamination is manifested by a delay in the onset of temperature rise during irradiation. The observed temperature changes are used to estimate the percentage conversion of double bonds from the bis/acrylamide monomers by polymerization reactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".