MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimal charging strategies for electrical vehicles under real time pricing

2014· article· en· W1984327433 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad M. Karbasioun, Ioannis Lambadaris, Gennady Shaikhet, Evangelos Kranakis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic programmingMarkov decision processMathematical optimizationComputer scienceBattery (electricity)Markov processCharging stationOptimal controlGridDynamic pricingTime horizonPower (physics)Automotive engineeringElectric vehicleEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We address the problem of serving plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) in a charging station using a local storage energy unit, with finite capacity. Our goal is to find a control policy minimizing the operational cost of the charging station. We assume that the price of the electrical power unit is determined by a Real Time Pricing scheme, in which, the price of the electrical power is continuously updated with respect to the state of the grid at each time instance. We first model the charging station as a continuous time Markov Decision Process with three control actions: the probability of blocking new arrivals, the rate of charging the battery and the proportion of cars being served by the battery. By using dynamic programming, we prove the existence of the optimal policy minimizing a discounted cost over an infinite time horizon. We also show that it is stationary and bang-bang, i.e. the admissible action set in the optimal policy assumes only the extreme values in the action set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207