Precise calculations of observables of polarized møller scattering: From JLAB to ILC energies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One-loop electroweak corrections to observables of the reaction e − e − → e − e −(γ) were calculated over a broad range of energies: from conditions of the MOLLER experiment at the Thomas Jefferson Laboratory (JLab) to those of planned experiments at the International Linear Collider (ILC). The dependence of various contributions to the observable polarization asymmetry on various renormalization conditions was studied within the scheme of on-shell renormalization. The results were obtained by two methods: precisely, by applying the FeynArts, FormCalc, LoopTools, and Form computer codes, and approximately, with the aid of the asymptotic-estimation methods. The resulting compact formulas are absolutely free from nonphysical parameters and are convenient for deducing numerical estimates. It is shown that the total one-loop correction is independent of renormalization conditions and takes an identical value within different computational schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".