MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984376385 · doi:10.1002/apj.5500130309

Dynamic Simulation and Advanced Control of a Heat Integrated Plant

2005· article· en· W1984376385 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral Processing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExothermic reactionModel predictive controlDynamic simulationHeat exchangerProcess (computing)EngineeringControl theory (sociology)Process controlEffluentChemical plantProcess engineeringControl (management)Control engineeringComputer scienceChemistryMechanical engineeringWaste managementSimulationChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Heat integrated plants involving exothermic chemical reactions show a degree of positive feedback and instability when trying to control the outlet temperatures of process‐to‐process, feed‐effluent heat exchangers. This is the case for the hydrodealkylation (HDA) of toluene process. In this study a 2 × 2 Model Predictive Control (MPC) scheme was implemented for the first time on a dynamic simulation of the HDA Plant. Comparison of its performance against the classical Ziegler‐Nichols and IMC tuning techniques for PI control was also carried out. The performance tests implemented suggest that PI control and MPC implemented over PI control are good choices to control this heat‐integrated plant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it