Study of the Semidilute Solutions of Poly(<i>N,N</i>-dimethylacrylamide) by Fluorescence and Its Implications to the Kinetics of Coil-to-Globule Transitions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The large scale motions of poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) chains randomly labeled with pyrene (Py-PDMA) were monitored by steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence in semidilute solutions of naked PDMA in acetone and DMF for polymer concentrations ranging from 0 to 550 g/L. Although increasing the polymer concentration of the solution led to a decrease of the mobility of the chromophore attached onto the PDMA backbone, this reduction was rather modest when compared to the large increase of the macroscopic viscosity. This result indicated that locally, the monomer constituting the chains experienced freedom of movement despite the high solution viscosity. The restricted mobility of the chromophore was characterized by the number of monomers occupying the volume probed by the excited chromophore during its lifetime, referred to as a fluorescence "blob". The number of monomers constituting a fluorescence blob, N(F)(-)(blob), and the volume of a fluorescence blob, V(F)(-)(blob), were found to decrease as the polymer concentration of the solution increased, reflecting the decreased mobility experienced by the chromophore. In DMF, the radius of an F-blob was found to scale as N(nu)(F)(-)blob, where nu equaled 0.66 +/- 0.03, very close to the expected value of the Flory exponent of 0.6 for a polymer in a good solvent. The combined knowledge of how N(F)(-)(blob) varies with the fluorescence lifetime of the chromophore and the coil density of the polymer was used to propose a new means of studying coil-to-globule transitions with potential implications for predicting the rate of protein folding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".