Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article will seek to introduce readers to an aspect of Canadian cultural life that is perhaps little known – printmaking – and, in particular, to three major figures. It will explore how their work is representative of new, less traditional approaches to printmaking. Most people think of printmaking as a 'traditional' art and it is true that traditional forms still have an important place. However, printmakers have always been happy to adopt the latest commercial innovations, and adapt their traditional skills and concepts to take account of technological advances. Much contemporary printmaking makes use of new technologies, especially digital print techniques. This article will discuss contemporary printmakers Richard Lacroix, Barbara Zeigler and Wayne Eastcott, all of whom have introduced new technologies into their work and who, in certain cases, may be said to be at the cutting edge. The article will also demonstrate how the work of these artists, although individualistic, reflects both their bel...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it