MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984427416 · doi:10.12968/bjon.2010.19.22.1387

Improving offender health care

2010· editorial· en· W1984427416 on OpenAlexaff
Ann Norman

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Nursing · 2010
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsRoyal Canadian Navy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrisonProject commissioningPrison populationHealth careNursingSubstance misuseMental healthPublic healthMedicineSubstance usePsychologyPsychiatryPublishingPolitical scienceCriminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Offender health care has seen significant change in the past decade. From transfer of commissioning responsibility moving to the NHS, a steadily increasing prison population and a more general awareness of the health needs of people in prison from mental health, substance misuse, learning disabilities and primary care provision; these changes have increased interest and debate among politicians, the public, the media and healthcare providers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of NursingSame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207