MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984427948 · doi:10.1002/elan.201100093

Determination of Dissolved Zn(II) and Cd(II) in Estuarine Water by Using a Bismuth Film Microelectrode

2011· article· en· W1984427948 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ana Paula Ruas de Souza, Maiara Oliveira Salles, Elisabete de Santis Braga, Mauro Bertotti

Bibliographic record

VenueElectroanalysis · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMicroelectrodeBismuthAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Anodic stripping voltammetryCopperElectrodeChemistryDetection limitZincMetalCertified reference materialsMaterials scienceElectrochemistryMetallurgyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A bismuth‐film electrode was employed to quantify Cd(II) and Zn(II) in estuarine water samples by anodic stripping voltammetry. The bismuth film was deposited in situ simultaneously with the analytes onto a carbon fibre disc microelectrode (radius=3 µm). Under the optimised conditions, calibration plots for both metallic ions were obtained in the range from 0.5 to 10.0 nmol L−1 and the limits of detection for Cd(II) and Zn(II) were estimated as 0.03 and 0.8 nmol L−1, respectively. The accuracy of the results supplied by the bismuth film microelectrode (BiFME) was assessed by performing addition‐recovery experiments and by comparing values with those obtained with a certified sample. The usefulness of the methodology was demonstrated by applying the BiFME to measuring the Cd(II) and Zn(II) content in estuarine water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectroanalysisSame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207