MRI-GUIDED prostate motion tracking by means of multislice-to-volume registration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We developed an algorithm for tracking prostate motion during MRI-guided prostatic needle placement, with the primary application in prostate biopsy. Our algorithm has been tested on simulated patient and phantom data. The algorithm features a robust automatic restart and a 12-core biopsy error validation scheme. Simulation tests were performed on four patient MRI pre-operative volumes. Three orthogonal slices were extracted from the pre-operative volume to simulate the intra-operative volume and a volume of interest was defined to isolate the prostate. Phantom tests used six datasets, each representing the phantom at a known perturbed position. These volumes were registered to their corresponding reference volume (the phantom at its home position). Convergence tests on the phantom data showed that the algorithm demonstrated accurate results at 100% confidence level for initial misalignments of less than 5mm and at 73% confidence level for initial misalignments less than 10mm. Our algorithm converged in 95% of the cases for the simulated patient data with 0.66mm error and the six phantom registration tests resulted in 1.64mm error.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".