MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984455300 · doi:10.1063/1.4901069

The effect of field-orientation on the magnetoelectric coupling in Terfenol-D/PZT/Terfenol-D laminated structure

2014· article· en· W1984455300 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsAnisotropyExcitationMaterials scienceMagnetic fieldOrientation (vector space)Field (mathematics)BiasingCoupling (piping)Magnetic anisotropyTerfenol-DShear (geology)MagnetostrictionPhysicsOpticsGeometryMagnetizationComposite materialMathematicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field-orientation dependent magnetoelectric coupling is experimentally studied for a rectangular Terfenol-D/PZT/Terfenol-D laminated structure. The considered magnetic field, namely the dc-bias magnetic field or the ac-excitation magnetic field, is allowed to be spatially re-orientated between two orthogonal geometric dimensions of the composite. In the study, the direction of the excitation can be fixed in the longitudinal (Scheme-I) or thickness (Scheme-II) directions, while considering the bias orientation. Alternatively, the bias field can be restricted to the longitudinal (Scheme-III) or thickness (Scheme-IV) directions, while the excitation orientation is considered. The variation in magnetoelectric coefficient as a function of the bias magnitude is studied with special attention paid to the field-orientation dependency. For the testing schemes of I and II, the direction of the dc-bias field can be re-oriented by forming an angle with the fixed direction of the ac-excitation field. As the angle changes from 0° to 90°, the magnetoelectric coupling evolves from L-T mode to S-T surface shear for Scheme-I, and from T-T mode to S-T thickness shear for Scheme-II. The bias-field-orientation dependence demonstrates a complex pattern due to the varying overall state of anisotropy in Terfenol-D. In Scheme-I with low bias magnitude, the orientation dependence can be represented by the measured effective longitudinal piezomagnetic coefficient. In addition, the optimal bias field for maximum magnetoelectric coefficient is observed to linearly increase with the bias orientation angle. Alternatively, the orientation dependence in Schemes III and IV is more predictable due to the barely changed overall state of anisotropy. In this case, Scheme-III shows that the magnetoelectric coefficient decreases monotonically with the orientation angle and Scheme-IV indicates that the maximum coefficient is attained at around 60°. The dependence of the magnetoelectric coupling on the excitation-filed orientation can be understood via analysis of the resultant magnetostriction in Terfenol-D with assumed effective magnetization, which may depart from the bias field due to the strong demagnetization effect. The analysis is supported by the computed field-orientation dependence of the magnetostriction in Terfenol-D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it