MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984464048 · doi:10.1016/s0840-4704(10)60730-2

Predictors of Job Stress and Satisfaction among Hospital Workers during Re-Engineering: <i>Differences by Extent of Supervisory Responsibilities</i>

2000· article· en· W1984464048 on OpenAlex
Christel A. Woodward, Harry S. Shannon, Bonnie Lendrum, Judy A Brown, John L. McIntosh, Charles E. Cunningham

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJob satisfactionJob stressPsychologyJob performanceJob attitudeWork (physics)Stress (linguistics)Position (finance)Applied psychologyNursingBusinessMedicineSocial psychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After two years of rapid organizational change within a large teaching hospital, 83 percent of workers remained employed there. Among these "survivors," job satisfaction decreased and job stress increased regardless of whether they were employed in a supervisory position. This article examines the predictors of job satisfaction and job stress for managers, for people who indicated that they supervised others but were not managers, and for workers. There are areas of commonality in predictors across these groups, as well as some differences by level of supervisory responsibility. Examining and modifying job characteristics associated with high stress could result in healthier hospital work environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it