MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984473368 · doi:10.1109/tpds.2003.1247668

Refactoring middleware with aspects

2003· article· en· W1984473368 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMiddleware (distributed applications)Common Object Request Broker ArchitectureAspect-oriented programmingCode refactoringModularity (biology)Message oriented middlewareDistributed computingSoftware engineeringArchitectureAbstractionSeparation of concernsAdaptabilityProcess (computing)Programming paradigmAspectJSoftware architectureProgramming languageSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Middleware platforms, such as Web services, J2EE, CORBA, and DCOM, have become increasingly popular during the last decade. They have been very successful in solving distributed computing problems for a large family of application domains. The architecture of middleware systems have gone through many significant cycles of evolution, both in terms of the completeness of functionality and the range of adoptions for different types of platforms. However, at the same time, it is getting increasingly difficult to achieve and to maintain a high level of adaptability and configurability because the structure of the middleware architecture is becoming overly complicated and rigid. We attribute that problem to the limitations of traditional software decomposition methods. Aspect-oriented programming, on the contrary, has introduced new design perspectives that permit the superimpositions of different abstraction models on top of one another. This is a very powerful technique for separating and simplifying design concerns. In our effort of applying principles of aspect orientation to the middleware architecture, we first pragmatically analyze the use of aspects in the middleware architecture. We then show that aspects are the correct remedy for the above outlined middleware problems by quantifying crosscutting concerns in the legacy implementations of several prominent middleware systems. Our aspect analysis results strongly indicate that modularity of middleware architecture is greatly hindered by the wide existence of tangled logic. To go one step further, we factor out a number of crosscutting concerns identified in the mining process, reimplement them as aspects, and superimpose them back into the refactored architecture. This allows us to use a set of software engineering metrics to quantify the refactorization in terms of changes in the structural complexity, modularity, and performance of the resulting system. This aspect-oriented refactoring proves that aspect orientation is capable of composing orthogonal design requirements. The final "woven" system is able to correctly provide both the fundamental functionality and the "aspectized" functionality with negligible overhead and an overall leaner architecture. Furthermore, the "aspectized" feature can be configured in and out during compile-time, which greatly enhances the configurability of the architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it