MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984474960 · doi:10.1190/1.2816650

Constructing piecewise-constant models in multidimensional minimum-structure inversions

2007· article· en· W1984474960 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Colin G. Farquharson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsSt. John’s Health Sciences CentreMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsPiecewiseInversion (geology)Measure (data warehouse)DiagonalAlgorithmSynthetic dataMathematicsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceGeometryGeologyMathematical analysisData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A modification of the typical minimum-structure inversion algorithm is presented that generates blocky, piecewise-constant earth models. Such models are often more consistent with our real or perceived knowledge of the subsurface than the fuzzy, smeared-out models produced by current minimum-structure inversions. The modified algorithm uses l1-type measures in the measure of model structure instead of the traditional sum-of-squares, or l2, measure. An iteratively reweighted least-squares procedure is used to deal with the nonlinearity introduced by the non-l2 measure. Also, and of note here, diagonal finite differences are included in the measure of model structure. This enables dipping interfaces to be formed. The modified algorithm retains the benefits of the minimum-structure style of inversion — namely, reliability, robustness, and minimal artifacts in the constructed model. Two examples are given: the 2D inversion of synthetic magnetotelluric data and the 3D inversion of gravity data from the Ovoid deposit, Voisey's Bay, Labrador.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations243
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207