MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984505653 · doi:10.1002/acs.1011

Blind identification of sparse Volterra systems

2007· article· en· W1984505653 on OpenAlexaff
Hong‐Zhou Tan, Yihua Huang, Jian Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIdentifiabilityVolterra seriesMoment (physics)Independent and identically distributed random variablesIdentification (biology)MathematicsApplied mathematicsVolterra equationsSystem identificationOrder (exchange)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmNonlinear systemRandom variableStatisticsArtificial intelligencePhysicsData modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is concerned with blind identification for single‐input single‐output Volterra systems with finite order and memory with the second‐order and the third‐order statistics. For the full‐sized Volterra system (i.e. all its kernels are nonzero) excited by unknown independently and identically distributed stationary random sequences, it is shown that blind identifiability does not hold in the second‐order moment (SOM) and the third‐order moment (TOM) domain. However, under some sufficient conditions, a class of truncated sparse Volterra systems, where some kernels are restricted to being zero, can be identified blindly and more Volterra parameters can be estimated in TOM than in SOM. Numerical examples illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal ProcessingSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207