MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984525266 · doi:10.1002/mop.20772

CPW feed to rectangular DRA

2005· article· en· W1984525266 on OpenAlex
Bratin Ghosh, Yahia M. M. Antar, A. Petosa, A. Ittipiboon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitive sensingMicrowaveResonatorElectrical engineeringEngineeringDielectricOptoelectronicsAntenna (radio)Coplanar waveguideElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Characteristics of uniplanar feed topologies for the dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) based on the CPW are presented. The dual‐resonance characteristics of the capacitive feed are discussed. A comparison of the CPW capacitive, square‐loop, and inductive feeds shows that the real‐estate requirements and radiation patterns are strongly influenced by the feed type. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 45: 210–216, 2005; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.20772

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it