MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984531437 · doi:10.1038/oby.2001.28

Effect of Insulin and Energy Restriction on the Thermic Effect of Protein in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2001· article· en· W1984531437 on OpenAlexafffund
Réjeanne Gougeon

Bibliographic record

VenueObesity Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Diabetes Association
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineInsulinDiabetes mellitusBody mass indexWeight lossType 2 diabetesMealWaistType 2 Diabetes MellitusObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test whether the thermic effect of oral protein is blunted in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and is corrected by normalization of glycemia with insulin and 28 days of a very-low-energy diet. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Resting energy expenditure (REE) and the thermic effect of 90 g of oral protein were measured, using indirect calorimetry, in nine (five women and four men) obese diabetic people [weight, 108 +/- 10 kg; waist circumference, 123 +/- 8 cm; body mass index, 40 +/- 3 kg/m(2)] who were hyperglycemic on day 8 or euglycemic with insulin on day 16 of a weight-maintaining diet and euglycemic on day 28 of a very low energy diet (VLED). Results were compared with those of seven (six women and one man) weight- and body mass index-matched obese nondiabetic subjects with a waist circumference of 111 +/- 6 cm. Substrates and hormonal responses were determined concurrently. RESULTS: Fasting glucose was normalized in the diabetic subjects with insulin from day 9 of VLED onward. Weight decreased in both groups by 9.9 +/- 0.9 kg with VLED. REE was 8 +/- 2% lower with insulin treatment and decreased by another 14 +/- 3% with VLED in the diabetic and by 15 +/- 1% in the nondiabetic subjects by week 4. After the protein meal, the thermic response was significantly (p < 0.05) less with hyperglycemia than with insulin-induced euglycemia, as percentage above REE (15.3 +/- 1.4 compared with 21.2 +/- 1.5%), as percentage of the energy content of the meal (19.5 +/- 1.5 compared with 25.2 +/- 1.7%), as kilocalories per 405 minutes (86 +/- 5 compared with 110 +/- 7), and less than in nondiabetic obese controls (21.0 +/- 2.2% above REE, 24.4 +/- 1.7% of energy of meal). After the VLED, the thermic effect of protein was significantly higher in both groups only as percentage above REE. The initial glucagon response was greater with hyperglycemia compared with euglycemia and post-VLED but not compared with the nondiabetic subjects. Hyperglycemia was associated with 21 +/- 4% greater urinary urea nitrogen excretion and urinary glucose losses of 134 +/- 50 mmol/d. DISCUSSION: This study shows a blunted thermic effect of protein in obese hyperglycemic type 2 diabetic subjects compared with matched nondiabetic subjects that can be corrected with insulin- or energy restriction-induced euglycemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObesity ResearchSame topicMuscle metabolism and nutritionFrench-language works237,207