MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984563167 · doi:10.1021/jp0480504

Variation of Fluorescence Lifetimes and Judd-Ofelt Parameters between Eu<sup>3+</sup> Doped Bulk and Nanocrystalline Cubic Lu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>

2004· article· en· W1984563167 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanocrystalline materialMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)EuropiumDopantDopingExcited stateNanocrystalLuminescenceEmission spectrumOscillator strengthSpectral lineAtomic physicsChemistryNanotechnologyPhysicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The luminescent properties of 1 mol % Eu 3+ -doped cubic Lu 2 O 3 nanocrystals prepared by a combustion synthesis route were investigated. The visible emission spectrum of the europium doped Lu 2 O 3 nanocrystals indicate that the structural environment surrounding the dopant Eu 3+ ion is distorted when compared to a bulk sample with a micrometer particle size. From the resulting emission spectra, the Ω 2 and Ω 4 Judd-Ofelt intensity parameters were calculated. The lifetimes of the 5 D 0 excited state for both the C 2 and C 3i sites were found to be nearly double that found for a similarly doped sample with larger particle size (bulk sample). This behavior is attributed to a change in the refractive index of the nanocrystalline material that in turn modifies the oscillator strength of the 4f ↔ 4f transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it