MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984614108 · doi:10.1080/1352725022000037209

Corporeal Politics and the Body Politic: the re-presentation of Louis Riel in Canadian identity

2002· article· en· W1984614108 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian S. Osborne

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Heritage Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetanarrativeBody politicNational identityPoliticsState (computer science)AlienationHEROSymbol (formal)Gender studiesHistoryIdentity (music)Political scienceGenealogySociologyArtNarrativeLiteratureLawAestheticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Louis Riel was the leader of the Métis uprisings of 1869 and 1885. The trajectory of Riel's dynamic memory from 1885 to 2001 is marked by his characterization as charismatic national leader, state traitor, cultural hero, symbol of reconciliation, and icon of 'postnationalism'. The initially simple metanarrative of a conflict between a proto-Métis-nation and an expansive proto-Canadian-state has been loaded with several discourses. Métis identity; Aboriginal rights; Western alienation; French-Canadian identity; state-nationbuilding. These may be discerned in the tensions permeating the commemoration of Riel's role in Canadian history at various sites throughout Canada over time. This paper will demonstrate the power of 'corporeal politics' as nationalizing-states approach the reconstruction of national eidolons, national chronicles, and national identities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0370.030
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Heritage StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207