MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984619149 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-3449

Abstract 3449: Tungsten induces DNA damage and alters growth of developing B lymphocytes

2010· article· en· W1984619149 on OpenAlexaff
Cynthia Guilbert, Luca A. Petruccelli, Koren K. Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScience, Research, and Medicine
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStromal cellTungstenApoptosisLeukemiaLymphoblastPeripheral blood mononuclear cellBiologyCell growthCell cultureCancer researchChemistryCell biologyMolecular biologyImmunologyBiochemistryGeneticsIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tungsten is used widely in modern life in everything from household goods to technologically advanced material. However, little is known about the consequences of tungsten exposure. The lack of information concerning the toxicities associated with tungsten has been highlighted recently when high tungsten levels were discovered at the sites of several pediatric leukemia clusters. In these clusters, the majority of the children developed acute lymphoblastoid leukemia of the preB lymphocyte subtype. Thus, we investigated whether tungsten exposure alters the growth of preB cells and defined signaling pathways induced by tungsten. We exposed a co-culture system of the BU-11 preB cell line grown on BMS2 stromal cells to tungsten at doses found at the sites of the leukemia clusters. Growth, cell cycle, and apoptosis were determined in both cell types. While no significant changes in any of these parameters were observed in the BMS2 stromal cells, tungsten treatment for 48 hours decreased the BU-11 cell number, which correlated with an accumulation of cells in G0/G1 and increased apoptosis. Unlike polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, tungsten induced apoptosis in BU-11 cells grown in rIL-7 and therefore, is independent of the stromal cell layer. These results were confirmed in primary murine bone marrow cultures and in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Tungsten can polymerize forming polytungstates in water and soil. Interestingly, these polytungstates are significantly more effective at inhibiting growth in BU-11 and BMS2 cells. In order to begin analysis of signaling pathways induced by tungsten, cDNA microarrays were performed in a leukemic cell line following 24 hours of tungsten treatment and integrated pathway analyses were performed. Genes involved in DNA damage and ER stress were highly upregulated following tungsten exposure and validated by qPCR. An increase in DNA damage was confirmed by COMET assay. These results suggest that the developing B lymphocyte population is sensitive to tungsten-induced toxicities and that tungsten exposure may contribute to leukemogenesis. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3449.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicScience, Research, and MedicineFrench-language works237,207