Paleoproterozoic submarine intrabasinal rifting, Baffin Island, Nunavut, Canada: volcanic structure and geochemistry of the Bravo Lake Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rocks of the Bravo Lake Formation on Turtle Back Island and Pillow Island off the western coast of central Baffin Island, Nunavut, represent a well-exposed example of the mafic volcanic and intrusive sequences commonly preserved near the base of Paleoproterozoic intracratonic basins in the Archean Rae and Hearne provinces of the Canadian Shield. The Bravo Lake Formation is composed of relatively undeformed amygdaloidal pillowed flows, radial columnar and tortoise-shell jointed pillows, hydroclastic breccia, extensional partially sheeted dyke swarms, laminated mafic sediments, massive and fragmental flows, and layered and megacrystic intrusions. Volcanic structures and textures imply emplacement in a low-energy shallow (<2 km depth) submarine environment. High-temperature submarine hydrothermal alteration of the Bravo Lake Formation mobilized Ba and Rb and was subsequently followed by dry closed system prograde amphibolite-facies regional metamorphism. Selected immobile trace element and rare-earth element (REE) compositions characterize these rocks as alkali basalt, minor tholeiitic basalt, and minor fractionated intermediate rocks that display significant light REE enrichment and high field-strength element concentrations suggestive of within-plate basalts. The stratigraphic setting, volcanic and intrusive structures, and chemical compositions suggest formation during local strike-slip-related rifting, rather than a mantle plume environment. The Bravo Lake Formation and its correlatives in other Paleoproterozoic intracratonic basins indicate that crustal thinning and the resultant local rifting of continental crust was widespread throughout the Rae and Hearne provinces of the Canadian Shield during the Paleoproterozoic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".