MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984673676 · doi:10.1142/s0219720008003291

COMPLEXITIES AND ALGORITHMS FOR GLYCAN SEQUENCING USING TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY

2008· article· en· W1984673676 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCenter for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTsinghua University
KeywordsGlycanTandem mass spectrometryComputational biologyGlycopeptideComputer scienceMass spectrometryProteomicsAlgorithmBiologyChemistryBiochemistryGeneChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Determining glycan structures is vital to comprehend cell-matrix, cell-cell, and even intracellular biological events. Glycan sequencing, which determines the primary structure of a glycan using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), remains one of the most important tasks in proteomics. Analogous to peptide de novo sequencing, glycan de novo sequencing determines the structure without the aid of a known glycan database. We show in this paper that glycan de novo sequencing is NP-hard. We then provide a heuristic algorithm and develop a software program to solve the problem in practical cases. Experiments on real MS/MS data of glycopeptides demonstrate that our heuristic algorithm gives satisfactory results on practical data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it