Further developments in the structure topology of the astrophyllite-group minerals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The structure topology and crystal chemistry have been considered for ten astrophyllite-group minerals that contain the HOH layer, a central trioctahedral (O) sheet and two adjacent (H) sheets of [5]- and [6]-coordinated D polyhedra and the astrophyllite (T 4 O 12 ) ribbons. The HOH layer is characterized by a planar cell with a ∼5.4, b ∼11.9 A ˚ and a^b ∼103°. The ideal composition of the O sheet is Fe 7 2+ (astrophyllite) or Mn 7 2+ (kupletskite). All structures consist of an HOH layer and an I (intermediate) block that consists of atoms between two HOH layers. In the astrophyllite group, there are two types of structures based on the type of linkage of HOH layers: (1) HOH layers link directly where they share common vertices of D octahedra, and (2) HOH layers do not link directly via polyhedra of the H sheets. The type-1 structure occurs in astrophyllite, niobophyllite, nalivkinite, tarbagataite, kupletskite, niobokupletskite and kupletskite-(Cs); the type-2 structure occurs in magnesioastrophyllite, sveinbergeite and devitoite. The general formulae for the eight astrophyllite-group minerals (astrophyllite, niobophyllite, nalivkinite, tarbagataite, kupletskite, niobokupletskite, kupletskite-(Cs), magnesioastrophyllite) and for the extended astrophyllite group including devitoite and sveinbergeite are A 2 BC 7 D 2 T 8 O 26 (OH) 4 X 0–1 and A 2p B r C 7 D 2 (T 4 O 12 ) 2 IX D2 O X A4 O X Dn P , respectively, where C and D are cations of the O and H sheets, C = [6]( Fe 2+ , Mn, Fe 3+ , Na, Mg, Zn) at the M (1–4) sites; D = [6,5] (Ti, Nb, Zr, Fe 3+ ); T = Si, minor Al; A 2p B r I is the composition of the I block where p = 1,2; r = 1,2; A = K, Cs, Li, Ba, H 2 O, ☐; B = Na, Ca, Ba, H 2 O, ☐; I represents the composition of the central part of the I block, excluding peripheral layers of the form A 2 B; X = O, OH, F and H 2 O; n = 0, 1, 2. Two topological issues have been considered: (1) the pattern of sizes of the M octahedra in the O sheet, M(1) > M(2) > M(3) > M(4) and (2) different topologies of the HOH layer in magnesioastrophyllite and all other structures of the astrophyllite group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it