MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984691110 · doi:10.1051/medsci/20102610869

Comment le virus de l’hépatite C détourne la réponse immunitaire adaptative orchestrée par les cellules dendritiques

2010· review· fr· W1984691110 on OpenAlexaff
Ian Gaël Rodrigue‐Gervais, Daniel Lamarre

Bibliographic record

Venuemédecine/sciences · 2010
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Saint-Luc
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMolecular biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a liver-borne infectious disease that remains a major global health threat. The mechanisms whereby HCV evades the host's immune defences and establishes persistent infection remain elusive; but they likely require a complex and coordinated interruption of the interplay between innate and adaptive immune actors. This review discusses the concept that HCV evades the host's immune response to its components partly because of its ability to inactivate the major orchestrator of the adaptive immune response - the DCs. It argues that DCs constitute an immunologically relevant cellular viral host actively targeted by HCV. This targeting disrupts TRIF- and IPS-1-dependent but not MyD88-coupled pathogen recognition receptors (PRR) sensing pathways in these infected cells to foil the networks by which innate immunity to HCV is translated into virus-specific adaptive immune-mediated host resistance. Thus, as a culprit, this cell-specific and numerically restrained DC defect offers a promising field of investigation in which to study and understand the HCV-restricted nature of the deficit in cellular immunity in persistently infected -individuals who have otherwise normal immune functions to unrelated pathogens. In this model, protective immunity is contingent on proper processing and delivery of danger signals by DCs presenting HCV antigens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemédecine/sciencesSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207