Two Regions of EpsL Involved in Species-Specific Protein-Protein Interactions with EpsE and EpsM of the General Secretion Pathway in <i>Vibrio cholerae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extracellular secretion of proteins via the type II or general secretion pathway in gram-negative bacteria requires the assistance of at least 12 gene products that are thought to form a complex apparatus through which secreted proteins are translocated. Although this apparatus is specifically required only for the outer membrane translocation step during transport across the bacterial cell envelope, it is believed to span both membranes. The EpsE, EpsL, and EpsM proteins of the type II apparatus in Vibrio cholerae are thought to form a trimolecular complex that is required to either control the opening and closing of the secretion pore or to transduce energy to the site of outer membrane translocation. EpsL is likely to play an important role in this relay by interacting with both the cytoplasmic EpsE protein and the cytoplasmic membrane protein EpsM, which is predominantly exposed on the periplasmic side of the membrane. We have now extended this model and mapped the separate regions within EpsL that contain the EpsE and EpsM binding domains. By taking advantage of the species specificity of the type II pathway, we have used chimeric proteins composed of EpsL and its homologue, ExeL, from Aeromonas hydrophila together with either EpsE or its Aeromonas homologue, ExeE, to complement the secretion defect in both epsL and exeL mutant strains. These studies have mapped the species-specific EpsE binding site to the N-terminal cytoplasmic region between residues 57 and 216 of EpsL. In addition, the species-specific EpsM binding site was mapped to the C-terminal half of EpsL by coimmunoprecipitation of EpsM with different EpsL-ExeL chimeras. This site is present in the region between amino acids 216 and 296, which contains the predicted membrane-spanning segment of EpsL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".