MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984704469 · doi:10.1063/1.1949290

Neutral base recombination in InP∕GaAsSb∕InP double-heterostructure bipolar transistors: Suppression of Auger recombination in p+ GaAsSb base layers

2005· article· en· W1984704469 on OpenAlexaff
C. R. Bolognesi, Hongxu Liu, N.G. Tao, X. Zhang, S. Bagheri-Najimi, S. P. Watkins

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuger effectMaterials scienceBipolar junction transistorOptoelectronicsHeterojunctionDopingHeterojunction bipolar transistorRecombinationAugerBase (topology)Gallium arsenideCarrier lifetimeChemical vapor depositionTransistorAtomic physicsChemistrySiliconVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the tradeoff between current gain β and the base sheet resistance RSH in metalorganic chemical vapor deposition-grown NpN InP∕GaAs1−xSbx∕InP double-heterojunction bipolar transistors (DHBTs) with heavy base carbon-doping levels resulting in hole concentrations NB ranging from 4×1019 to 12×1019∕cm3. In contrast to Ga0.47In0.53As and GaAs–based transistors, which both display gain variations proportional to 1∕(NB×WB)2 due to Auger recombination at high doping levels, neutral base recombination in InP∕GaAsSb∕InP DHBTs is not limited by Auger processes, and the measured current gain is proportional to 1∕(NB×WB). We show that GaAs1−xSbx base layers offer a growing lifetime advantage over Ga0.47In0.53As with increasing doping levels. Potential explanations for the observed suppression of Auger recombination in the InP–GaAsSb system are proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207