MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1984711291 · doi:10.1117/12.462163

<title>Image-based retrospective cardiac gating for three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound imaging</title>

2002· article· en· W1984711291 on OpenAlexafffund
Seemantini K. Nadkarni, Derek R. Boughner, Aaron Fenster

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsIntravascular ultrasoundArtifact (error)Imaging phantomCardiac cycleLumen (anatomy)Artificial intelligenceImage qualityComputer visionCoronary arteriesComputer scienceBiomedical engineeringMedicineRadiologyImage (mathematics)ArteryCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-dimensional (3D) intravascular ultrasound provides valuable insight into the tissue characteristics of the coronary wall and plaque composition. However, artifacts due to cardiac motion and vessel wall pulsation limit the accuracy and variability of coronary lumen and plaque volume measurement in 3D IVUS images. ECG-gated image acquisition can overcome these artifacts but results in lengthy acquisition times. Our goal is to reconstruct a 3D IVUS image with negligible vessel pulsation artifacts, by developing an image-based retrospective gating method to track 2D IVUS images belonging to the same cardiac phase. Our approach involves selecting 2D IVUS images belonging to the same cardiac phase from an asynchronously acquired series, by tracking the changing lumen contour over the cardiac cycle. The algorithm was tested using a custom-built coronary phantom and on patient images. 3D non-gated and gated IVUS images were assembled and compared. The extent of pulsation artifacts in the 3D images was estimated by measuring the standard deviation in the shift in the position of the lumen boundary in each cross-sectional slice over the 3D IVUS image. A reduction in pulsation artifact of over 97% was observed in the 3D image assembled using our method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207