MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1984747105 · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ovca13-a45

Abstract A45: Beclin1-independent autophagy promotes the survival of metastatic ovarian cancer cells

2013· article· en· W1984747105 on OpenAlexaff
Rohann Correa, Yudith Ramos-Valdes, Teresa Peart, Elena N. Fazio, Monique Bertrand, Jacob McGee, Michel Préfontaine, Akira Sugimoto, Trevor G. Shepherd, Gabriel E. DiMattia

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutophagyCell biologyDownregulation and upregulationATG5BAG3BiologyAutophagosomeSmall interfering RNACancer researchChemistryCell cultureTransfectionApoptosisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) metastasis proceeds by an intra-peritoneal route, involving detachment of cells from the primary tumor and dissemination throughout the peritoneal cavity as multicellular aggregates, or spheroids. Herein, we demonstrate that ascites-derived cells upregulate the process of macroautophagy (autophagy), a highly-conserved self-digestion mechanism that functions to mitigate cellular stresses. Both non-adherent culture of these cells to form in vitro spheroids as well as exposure to an allosteric AKT inhibitor stimulated this process, as evidenced by Western blot and immunofluorescence staining for the autophagy marker MAP1LC3B (LC3). Likewise, expression of an eGFP-labeled LC3 protein revealed a shift from diffuse to ‘punctate’ cytoplasmic localization, demonstrating the formation of intracellular autophagic vesicles (autophagosomes). Additionally, we performed transmission electron microscopy and autophagy flux assays, confirming that autophagic degradation proceeded to completion. To determine the role of autophagy upregulation, we attempted to block this process using siRNAs targeting critical autophagy-related (ATG) genes. Interestingly, we found that depletion of Beclin1/ATG6 had no effect on autophagy, despite its role as a canonical inducer of the process. Conversely, depletion of the autophagy regulators ATG5 & ATG7 efficiently blocked LC3 processing and autophagosome formation. Likewise, autophagy was also blocked pharmacologically using the classical inhibitor Chloroquine and the novel agent Spautin-1 (the first targeted autophagy inhibitor to be published). Autophagy blockade by any of these mechanisms reduced EOC cell viability in both adherent and spheroid cultures, suggesting that the upregulation of this process serves to promote cell survival. Moreover, when autophagy blockade was combined with AKT inhibition, a synergistic reduction in cell survival was observed based on combination index analysis. Taken together, this work describes spheroid formation as a stimulus for a non-canonical, Beclin1-independent autophagy program, but also reveals autophagy to be a promoter of tumor cell survival during ovarian cancer metastasis, particularly in cells subjected to AKT/mTOR inhibition. In light of these findings, we propose that clinical autophagy inhibition could enhance the effectiveness of current or investigational ovarian cancer therapies. Citation Format: Rohann Correa, Yudith Ramos-Valdes, Teresa Peart, Elena Fazio, Monique Bertrand, Jacob McGee, Michel Préfontaine, Akira Sugimoto, Trevor G. Shepherd, Gabriel E. DiMattia. Beclin1-independent autophagy promotes the survival of metastatic ovarian cancer cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: From Concept to Clinic; Sep 18-21, 2013; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2013;19(19 Suppl):Abstract nr A45.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.244
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy→French-language works237,207→